I can’t believe what I just saw: Could the Padres be the new Gashouse Gang and other first week MLB musings

It’s been a great season to date, the first week of MLB 2009. Lots of surprises, uplifting moments, tragedy and pathos as well as new stadia.

With the exception of Fox’s odious Saturday blackouts, every game is available for live viewing between MLB Extra Innings and MLB.com.

I’ve watched every inning of every game. Your reporters and anal assyss hired by MLB.com haven’t. Neither have your MLB TV studio analysts, baseball executives, sports observers, practically everybody else in America.

For what it’s worth, since everybody else gets the recognition and perks — MLB.com doesn’t believe I know anything about baseball or have any insights, ability etc., and denies me access to the press room, thanks Dinn Mann, Bill Hill, Jim Banks — here are some of my insights into the new season.

For starters, looks like I was right on about the Royals. I believe this team will be in the playoffs for the first time in decades. Too bad the Orioles are deficient in pitching since they have a hitting juggernaut. Rangers pitching appears improved. They throw bat after bat at you with a legion of MLB-ready players in the high minors along with several MVP candidates including my fellow Hebrew Ian Kinsler and the Mickey Mantle clone that is Josh Hamilton. The Angels have been hit hard by injury, death, everything, so we got a race here.

We got a race everywhere in fact. It looks surprisingly — given the disparity in team payrolls — like parity on the field. I firmly believe in parity. That makes it great for the majority of fans. Dynasties are for elitist losers.

The teams succeeding this year — year two of the steroid-as-free-as-monitor-able era — have certain similar characteristics. These teams comprise a slew of interchangeable, moving parts; extreme flexibility as far as position players and pitching assignments. The Cardinals look to be a prime example of this post-steroid phenomenon along with the aforementioned Royals and restocked for prime time Marlins.

The new stadiums have been great. Despite pre-opening pitcher park rhetoric, the Mets new Citibank ripped me off and now gets a government bailout and gets to name their stadium a la” Enron Field remember that kiddies, ballpark, looks to be good hitting. So does the new Yankee Stadium, which looks like the ultimate culmination of the new age of cookie cutter cool experience stadiums, but in a good way. The games there have been wild and the ball goes Babe Ruth into the Right Field day.

The most amazing series of on-field happenings have surrounded my pride and “joy?” Padres. While I predicted 105 losses, the first week has given me pause. They still may lose a ton of games but as in the 2000 stolen presidential election — and thanks for screwing up the world, Bush — the results may take a while to come in and surprise in the end.

A number of factors have aided the Padres, which is why I’m saying the season is too close to call as yet. For one thing, they beat up on the Dodgers at Petco — an annual tradition, regardless of disparate team strength — then beat up on the Giants. the Jints, however, appear weak and listless, any progress they seemed to make last year probably was a mirage.

The Padres ushered in new Enron Field. Initially, I looked at this like Texas scheduling Rice for homecoming, a sure win for a new era. On further review, one might conclude the Padres caught a break as the Mets may have been tentative and nervous with the new field. As well, the Mets were no more familiar with the field than the Padres, losing part of the traditional home field advantage.

Yet, the Padres clearly played with unusual fervor, a newfound sense of purpose and true grit. I was unprepared for this based on last year’s listless litany of loss. Part of this, it turns out, may be due to adding Ted Simmons and Jim Lefebvre to the senior coaching staff. These guys — and Bud Black is the first to acknowledge — have added a lot of knowledge and pizzazz to the team mix.

Even more-so, the addition of David Eckstein, maturing of Chase Headley and Kevin Kouzmanoff, solid pitching, especially from castoff relievers added in the last few weeks of spring training, as well as a tough, underdog, devil-may-care attitude — maybe a new Gashouse Gang in these troubled economic times — has paid dividends.

Here is the yin and yang of this. Some of the success of the new wave of Padres pitchers may be due to the league’s unfamiliarity with them. Maybe the second time around the league won’t be so fruitful. Same goes for Padres hitters, most of whom are young and untested. On the other hand…

A team that learns it can win, often does win. The Padres have come from significant deficits in difficult games to win several times. Given their lack the high-priced talent, they also lack the high-priced egos. Many Padre players already have noted the team chemistry and spirit of self-sacrifice, although winning generally pins a happy spin on such perceptions, Despite the individual nature of much of the baseball experience, it remains a team game with sacrifice and execution a large part of team success.

Several come from behind victories on the road — including Saturday’s shocking stopping of Brad Lidge’s 47-save straight streak — have planted a seed in the Padre brainwaves and sometimes that seed grows to be a mighty redwood. It has happened before.

With that said, I continue to believe the Padres will sink fast into oblivion, but 

my slam dunk feeling has tempered greatly given what has transpired this first week. I’m willing to let it slide a few weeks because stranger turnabouts have happened.

I also want to make it perfectly clear that being the frontrunner I am when it comes to hometown baseball, I am quite willing to jump on the Padres bandwagon should it continue to roll downhill.

But that’s for another day, a further column. In the meantime, continue to play ball!

And a shout out to MLB.com for employing everybody but me, so I get to stand in the soup line and starve, while everybody else gets to get paid for covering baseball somewhat less well than me. At least, I was able to pay in advance for MLB.com before I went completely broke this week. 

Consider very carefully my 2009 MLB predictions because I am very often correct although I don’t get no Rodney Dangerfield respect

I don’t get no respect. Shout ode to Rodney Dangerfield, one of my ideals. I picked the Rays to go to the World Series last year, but nary a nod anywhere in the world of faux baseball punditry.

Therefore, consider my picks for 2009 with the utmost respect and expect the expected this fall. That’s just the way my baseball prognostications roll.

AL EAST

1. Boston

2. New York

3. Tampa Bay

4. Baltimore

5. Toronto

AL CENTRAL

1. Kansas City

2. Minnesota

3. Cleveland

4. Chicago

5. Detroit

AL WEST

1. Los Angeles

2. Texas

3. Oakland

4. Seattle

NL EAST

1. New York

2. Philadelphia

3. Atlanta

4. Florida

5. Washington

NL CENTRAL

1. Chicago

2. Cincinnati

3. St. Louis

4. Pittsburgh

5. Houston

NL WEST

1. Los Angeles

2. Arizona

3. Colorado

4. San Francisco

5. San Diego

PLAYOFFS

AL

Bos v. KC

NYY v. LAA;

Bos v. NYY;

Bos….

NL

Chic v. Phil

NYM v. LAD;

Chic v. NYM

Chic….

WORLD SERIOUS 

Yes, that’s correct, dream matchup Red Sox v. Cubs and I predict the Red Sox in six games.

So, who needs to watch. See you in October.

Pity the poor Padres: Free fall below, as in Opening Day awaits with105 losses to go

The arty party line as spring training ends is this team is going to surprise people.

Lose 105 to 110 games. Surprise!

The Padres somehow while we were sleeping or something became the worst team in baseball. Surprise!

While plenty of blame can go around, the continual spin is quite disingenuous. Saying this team is better than it looks is such a misrepresentation that trying to fool people will work only so long, say the first 10 or 15 games of the season.

Let’s see what the Padres bring to the table. Adrian Gonzales, Jake Peavy, if he doesn’t get hurt;  Kouzmanoff, Headley somewhat, maybe even a bit of an occasional spark from Gerut.

That’s not even enough for team mediocrity considering the rest of the story. An incredibly overpaid Brian Giles, adequate in right, Eckstein adequate at second even though other teams couldn’t wait fast enough to get rid of him in the last few years.

Ahh, hmmm, pitching, Besides Peavy who would be gone asap if the Padres were at all reasonable in trade demands, Chris Young, who does not appear right and can’t win on the road even when he is right; no other starting pitching, really none. Bullpen in disarray, Bell might be good, but consider Meredith as his primary set-up man followed by five pitchers acquired in the last two weeks, each of whom was about the be cut and by teams such as the Nationals.

This team is a disgrace. John Moores is to blame of course. So is Sandy Alderson whose tenure as baseball president was a disaster. I wouldn’t blame Bud Black since his hire was a Good Old Boy network type of thing apparently. His in-game moves are pitiful, but he seems like a stand-up guy. First manager to be fired this year? Possibly. It’s hard to see how he could last the season unless management feels the season is so lost it doesn’t matter. Otherwise, he’s gone.

Not helping the viewing fan is Cox Channel 4 monopoly on coverage yielding the insipid Mark Grant — probably the worst MLB announcer in the nation, a sad combination of zero actual baseball knowledge with disgusting self-promotion of the nothing brand that is his awfulness — and a new guy who spent 20 years at Tulsa and is boring, over-his-head, etc. 

Thanks goodness for MLB.com, Direct TV baseball package, etc. so at least we’ll be able to watch baseball, and not be limited to Padres games circa 1970s baseball world.

It’s going to be one of the worst seasons ever by an MLB team.

Thanks for nothing Moores-Alderson ad nauseum liars all. Enjoy your MLB bailout and non-performance bonuses.

JOKE–NO JOKE: Padres will lose 105 games this year

Note: I am re-printing this article from March 31 just so everybody knows who knows it first…

The Padres are about to embark on one of the worst seasons in baseball history. Plenty of blame to go around although much of it at this point must be centered on John and Becky Moores and Sandy Alderson.

While it’s all good and well to go around saying how much one loves the Padres etc., the fact is Moores and family milked this sucker for all it was worth and a lot more. They turned — or rather, circumstances, the economy and MLB popularity turned — an $84 million investment into $500 million. Good for them, but don’t pretend your love for the Padres, their fans and San Diego is paramount when it isn’t. Just witness the dismantling of the team over a few dollars in an environment when teams are expanding rosters and payrolls.

What’s more, the Moores’ choice of Alderson was disastrous. The drafts were terrible, maybe the worst in baseball. Not only was Matt Bush recently called the second worst draft pick in MLB history, but the lack of drafted players in the majors is amazing. Other than that, Alderson’s stupidity drove away all decent baseball guys and left yes-men and sycophants or a few smart guys whose advice was ignored.

The Padres will lose around 105 games easy. Thanks for nothing!

As an added blog bonus today only, this is the e-mail I sent the Padres TV pigs about their coverage, too (Thanks goodness for MLB Network, MLB Extra Innings and MLB. com for real coverage)…

You don’t even have a proper way to e-mail you with comments, how user unfriendly with this form.

The fact is the only reason anybody would watch your Padres coverage is you have a monopoly, but that will end, too. This year, don’t complain  when your ratings are zero, or say it’s because the team is bad or the economy sucks.

The reason nobody will be watching is evidenced today by your Padres=Brewers coverage. The announcers are the worst in baseball. Do yo have any doubt if a Vince Scully or even a Matt Vasgersian were broadcasting you would have a few viewers, just because it was interesting despite a terrible team. But now, you have a Mark Grant who is so odious, obnoxious and disgusting with his self-promotions and BS fake knowledge and your new guy is so boring and nondescript that it is a chore to listen and watch, actually like a job (bad) or even an affliction.

I’m a big baseball fan, but I’m afraid I will watch alternative baseball coverage rather than yours because yours is so sub-standard, even annoying and worse, stupid and maddening.

Don’t bother with your form reply, we blah blah and other people blah blah blah… You’re fooling only yourselves. The fact is you’ve dug your own ratings grave whether you believe it or not and I HATE YOU FOR REMOVING THIS PLEASURABLE EXPERIENCE of enjoying Padres baseball on TV, even if the team is bad,, although I’m sure watching the Rockies, Giants, Dodgers, D-Backs, anybody but the Padres will remain my baseball solace.

Thanks for nothing!

Astros Win! Astros Win! Stop the cyberpresses…

Sure, spring training baseball games matter not, permanent record-wise. What was the Rays spring training record last year? Nobody cares, but it was 18-8. The Phillies were 12-18. So there.

However, the Astros have posted an impressive string of futility this spring, winning the first game against MLB competition, then proceeding to lose 16 games in a row, with three ties thrown in for bad measure. Even a blind squirrel wins one of those games, one might John Lennon imagine.
But spring, in its true sense, emerged on March 20. And with the season turn turn turn, an Astros prison break-out, four whole runs. Hoo-ra!
It wasn’t easy, of course. Cecil Cooper said he was going to manage the game as if it counted and had to back that up with a 9th Inning call to the bullpen for a closer after the Reds scored two runs and sent the tying run up to the plate.
Katie slammed the door, however, for Win #2 this springless training. First win since Feb. 25. They celebrated like it was 1999.
Win #3? At this rate: April 17.

Lookee Lookee Dontrelle Willis is in mid-season form

Who says you need Spring Training? Look at the D-Train, Dontrelle Willis in action He was in rare mid-season form at 4 p.m. Pacific Time. Shellshocked.  Three runs home. Bombs away.

But seriously, Willis looks like hell. Maybe he got hit by a truck. He weighs a ton and can’t take the humidity, er, heat.
Se ya’ in Lakeland, April, Florida State League Dontrelle.
That’s all, folks…

Hey Mr. Sandman: American League teams to watch in 2009

Thanks to this being 2009 when everything is available for viewing anywhere all the time, I’ve seen more Big League baseball in the month of March than I would have seen in half-a-season in, say, 1979.

Indeed, as long ago as 2006, few spring games were televised. Now, several are on every day. Not to mention the World Baseball Classic, which has been a super-hit this year, the quality of play at Major League level and intriguing.

Every MLB game will be televised, or video-cast, in some format this year, a far cry from crowds of 1,500 at the Oakland Coliseum — A’s v. M’s for last place in a dismal 1978, I was there — and no radio broadcast.

But, I digress.

Based on early observation, my picks for “surprise” teams this season in the American League:

Orioles, Indians and Royals.

The O’s under Larry McPhail seem much better and on the right track. Their pitching has improved greatly and appears underrated. Their farm system has stepped up with prospects and enthusiasm. I believe they will pound the ball. Unfortunately, the AL East is an incredibly tough neighborhood as we all know. But this team will be interesting, probably for the first half of the seasn before fading under the pressure of Sox-Yanks-Rays and come what may.

Similarly, the Indians look very strong. With Joe Mauer appearing out for a long period of time, so goes the hopes of the Twins, who will be strong, but not strong enough. It looks like the Tribe will be able to challenge the White Sox. Pitching is strong despite the losses — CC, no-no etc. — with Lee and Carmona looking good so long as their arms don’t fail them now. Wood isn’t the 1998 version, but is a bullpen upgrade. Their bats are flat-out awesome. I like this team.

Flying under the radar, the Royals have assembled a balanced, and impressive, team of good, exciting young players supplemented by winning veterans. The team displays speed and power, a top-line bullpen and strong group of starting pitchers. The defense appears solid. What more can we ask? They haven’t won anything in decades, but this team has the look of a real contender, maybe the Rays of 2009.

Then again, I’ve seen a lot of Royals games the last few years, much to my chagrin. Frankly, I’ve made an obscure specialty of watching Royals games, despite living on the West Coast. There has been a wackiness to them the last few years reminiscent of the 1960s Mets. I’ve developed a soft spot for those darn guys, especially after witnessing some amazing defeat-snatched-from-victory efforts over time. But ,they always hustle. 

I’ve also enjoyed Indians games, since Cleveland appears to be a mirror, or polar, opposite of San Diego. I liked the obscurity of Indians players — the likes of Grady Sizemore, Jhonnny (bonus points for spelling that name correctly) Peralta and Jim Thome — whose performances speak for themselves, even if nobody outside of Cleveland listens.

With that said, I might go to a sports book in Vegas and drop a couple of Andrew Jacksons on both teams to make the playoffs. However, I’m not a betting man (and have seen a load of Royals and Indians games over the years).

Through the sands of time: The 1978 Red Sox v. Yankees playoff reconsidered

MLB Network is a great success, no question. From the daily coverage of Spring Training to the special documentaries and films, in-studio analysis, they’ve got the Rolls Royce of sports stations currently. Who knew?

Replays of games past has been a particularly interesting bit of programming. MLB.com did this to some degree, but nothing like the new television product. The opportunity to watch legends perorm real-time in games from the 1940s to 2001 is enlightening and, in some cases, amazing.. 

Consider then October 1978, Fenway Park; Red Sox v. Yankees playoff for the AL East. Memory, or folklore, may not gibe exactly with fact.

Bucky Dent actually hit his famous home run in the 7th Inning. It gave the Yankees a 3-2 lead, but did not win the game. He didn’t think the ball would leave the park and it barely did. I believe many people now, 31 years later, forget that, In fact, Reggie Jackson hit a later home run and the Yankees saw their 5-2 lead shrink to 5-4 in the 8th Inning.

Ron Guidry coming off a 25-3 Cy Young year was a bit less sharp than usual. (he only reason he is not in the Hall of Fame is his career was 13 years, not long enough but from 1977 to 1985. He was one of the most dominant pitchers in baseball.

Here is something that would never happen today. Closer Goose Gossage came in the 7th Inning to finish the game. The Sox had runners on First and Second in the 9th Inning after Pinella lost a fly ball in the sun. Carl Yastrzemski, who had hit a home run for the first run of the game, made the last out. The Yankees won 100 games, the Red Sox, 99.

Also not considered today. Sox manager Don Zimmer came out to the mound to talk to Mike Torres just prior to Dent’s home run and left him in the game. After the home run and another batter, he lifted Torres. And shout out to Red Sox Nation,  Jerry “Remdog” Remy had a great, clutch game.

Robbie Alomar goes YA-YA’S

I lived in Tampa and worked Clearwater, Dunedin, Port Richey and such when Robbie Alomar starred for the Toronto Blue Jays. I always considered him a great and totally underrated ballplayer, Hall of Fame caliber. I even spoke to him a few times.

So, I had a soft spot for Alomar. And then some.
See, when somebody asked him for the name of his favorite restaurant, he came back Ya-Ya’s. Actually, he said: “I. Roberto Alomar, Blue Yays second baseman love Ya Ya’s chicken.”
ME TOO! I loved Ya Ya’s. They had like six or seven outlets around the Tampa Bay area, served awesome healhy grilled chicken dinners at reasonable prices, fast. Great salads and sides.
So when Robbie went Ya-Ya’s, so did I during my frequent visits to the place. YA-YA’S!!!
And now this. The AIDS thing. Amazingly given Alomar’s frequent upstaging by others over his baseball years, he couldn’t even get no respect for a GIGANTIC SCANDAL, probably. The legal paperwork spewed forth from a palimony suit on the AIDS problem just when the ARod news broke, so Alomar, even in possible demise, was upstaged.
But the Alomar affair has so many angles, it’s hard to know where to start. #1: He has HIV and AIDS? Huh? He was raped as a 17-year-old by men ouside his first minor league team’s park? Huh? And so much more, like his seven-year live-in girlfriend — they call that a wife at many trailer parks — and her past as a “champion female arm-wrestler”, as shown in old clips. ARE YOU KIDDING ME!
Considering we can count on no fingers the number of acknowledged Major League Baseball. or former MLB players with AIDS, or victims of rape for that matter, this story would be blown up al over the hemisphere.
Barely a whimper however this week. We’ll hear a lot more. You heard it here first.

What about the other 103? Questions, questions and questions

Now that ARod is revealed as one of the 104 “anonymous” players testing positive for steroids in 2003, what about the other 103?

Fair is fair. Shouldn’t we know which other players were juicing in 2003 as if we couldn’t guess many names already? But plenty we can’t guess, especially when they were using the steroid d’jour, the clear.
The fact is many of these guys are hypocritically going around pretending they’re clean when they aren’t, so aren’t they the BIGGEST cheats of all? Shouldn’t they be called out for the good of the game?
They think they are free and CLEAR. But the entire mess is made all the worse by factors such as Gene Orza and who knows who else circumvented the steroid testing. And those were just the test tests, not the REAL tests that would result in suspensions. You don’t think they would be even more eager to circumvent testing shoud it affect clients or friends in the financial way?
It’s a whole ‘nother debate on the steroids era in general. Steroids weren’t fair because it gave cheaters the advantage. On the other hand, they also weren’t illegal in America until the late 1990s nor illegal in baseball until after 2003, so in the great tradition of getting away with what you can in baseball, how bad were they?
Actually, I liked the steroid era, you know the “Chicks dig the long ball” era, the home runs and scoring just as much as I hated the 1960s era of the pitcher. If that was due to steroid use, maybe steroid use should be legal in baseball.
But in this case, it is patently unfair to single out Arod. Release the other 103 names then since the anonymous shield is gone. Why not? They were juicing, right? They should come CLEAN anyway for the good of the game..
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.